Archive for March, 2006

The Spider of Doom

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006

[www.thedailywtf.com]


Josh Breckman worked for a company that landed a contract to
develop a content management system for a fairly large government
website. Much of the project involved developing a content management
system so that employees would be able to build and maintain the
ever-changing content for their site.


Because they already had an existing website with a lot of content,
the customer wanted to take the opportunity to reorganize and upload
all the content into the new site before it went live. As you might
imagine, this was a fairly time consuming process. But after a few
months, they had finally put all the content into the system and
opened it up to the Internet.


Things went pretty well for a few days after going live. But, on day
six, things went not-so-well: all of the content on the website had
completely vanished and all pages led to the default “please enter
content” page. Whoops.


[…]


As it turns out, Google’s spider doesn’t use cookies, which means that
it can easily bypass a check for the “isLoggedOn” cookie to be
“false”. It also doesn’t pay attention to Javascript, which would
normally prompt and redirect users who are not logged on. It does,
however, follow every hyperlink on every page it finds, including
those with “Delete Page” in the title.


Whoops.



(Via).


Tags:

[Comment Link for RSS]

source: The Spider of Doom

Public Transit == Crime

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006

I just received a very nice info-pack through my front door regarding the new
Dublin Metro
line
, which is
in planning at the moment; it seems they’re soliciting feedback from residents
near the proposed routes. Nicely done.

Right now, Dublin has an embarrassment of good public transit, at least when
compared to my previous home in Orange County. There, public transit is actively campaigned against.

My favourite claim: that it ‘increases
crime’
— in other words that poor
people from Santa Ana would come down to Irvine and steal stuff, which they
couldn’t do with vehicular transport, for some reason.

The OC Weekly thought
it was pretty funny, too — and an opposing group comprehensively debunked
it
. Still, it seemed to work;
while I was living in Irvine, I got to see the Centerline proposal gradually
whittled down until it was finally killed off. During that time, in contrast,
Dublin built the Luas.

Unfortunately it doesn’t exactly go where I want to go, but you can’t always
have everything. ;)

This post was written by Justin, source: Public Transit == Crime

Richard Poynder interviews Jay Rosen

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006
Richard Poynder has posted his interview with Jay Rosen, a leader of open-source journalism. This is the latest installment of The Basement Interviews, Poynder’s blog-based OA book of interviews with leaders of many related openness initiatives.

source: Richard Poynder interviews Jay Rosen

Day 1 of Berlin 4

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006
Richard Sietmann, Informationsversorgung an den Hochschulen immer schwieriger zu erfüllen, Heise Online, March 29, 2005. A report on Day 1 of the Berlin 4 meeting, now in progress.

source: Day 1 of Berlin 4

Max Planck will pay processing fees at NJP

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006
The Max Planck Society has agreed to pay the article processing fees for its faculty when they publish in the OA New Journal of Physics. From yesterday’s announcement:
In a move to open-up access to scientific research, an initiative announced today will enable German scientists to publish their research free of charge in New Journal of Physics (NJP), the online open-access journal jointly owned by the Institute of Physics (IOP) and the Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft. The Max Planck Society (MPG), a leading German research organisation, will pay the NJP article publication charge centrally for all of its scientists who submit work to the journal before the end of 2008. NJP was one of the first open-access, electronic-only journals, publishing original research articles across the whole of physics. Permanently free to read, NJP is funded solely by article publication charges. The journal has grown by more than 900% since 2001 and over 40,000 NJP articles are now downloaded each month. NJP’s official impact factor has risen from 2.480 in 2003 and is currently 3.095. Ken Lillywhite, journals business director at Institute of Physics Publishing said, “We are delighted to maximize the opportunity for researchers at Max-Planck institutes to benefit from publishing with the journal. This will help NJP establish itself yet further as a premier research journal serving the whole physics community. Receiving the endorsement of a research organisation with the international stature of the Max Planck Society is a key development for the journal’s open-access publishing model.” Kurt Mehlhorn, vice president of the Max Planck Society said, “According to the Berlin Declaration the MPG advocates the publication of scientific works in journals which are dedicated to open-access. The MPG aims to find solutions that support further development of the existing financial framework of scientific publishing. I am strongly convinced that offering our scientists the opportunity to make their papers open-access will be a success because it provides authors with extra choice and will improve access to published articles….”

source: Max Planck will pay processing fees at NJP

The Great Sales and Marketing Debate: The Cagey Sales Veterans Debate the Young Up-and-Comers

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006

I recently was fortunate to participate in a panel discussion on “The Great Sales and Marketing Debate: The Cagey Sales Veterans Debate the Young Up-and-Comers”, sponsored by the New York Software Industry Association, March 13, 2006, held at JP Morgan Chase.

Allen Reynolds and Jesse Mandell all took some notes, which we have merged in the summary below.

Master of Ceremonies, Bruce Bernstein, welcomed and introduced the two questioners and four debaters.

Questioners: Sherri Sklar and Ruth P. Stevens

Sherri Sklar, President, Sherri Sklar Strategies, LLC
Sherri Sklar has built a star track record in helping organizations obtain exceptional results. Over the last 20 years, she has enabled organizations to make dramatic turnarounds, helping under-performing divisions achieve significant growth in the most difficult of marketplace conditions. Ms. Sklar has helped organizations in marketing strategy and execution, sales strategy, sales execution and performance, business development strategy, channel management, and communication skills training. A frequent presenter at seminars and conferences, Ms. Sklar practices and teaches ‘peak performance delivery’, a proprietary technique Ms. Sklar employs to help clients achieve optimal results. Ms. Sklar is President of her own consulting company, Sherri Sklar Strategies, LLC., (SSS). SSS is a sales, marketing and business development consulting firm that delivers measurable results from assessment, proven strategies, and excellence in execution. Ms. Sklar received her MBA from Harvard Business School and her BA from Newcomb College at Tulane University.

Ruth P. Stevens
Ruth P. Stevens’ expertise in customer acquisition and retention derives from a decade and a half of hands-on marketing for both large enterprises and start-up companies. Just prior to beginning her consulting practice, she served as chief marketing officer at an Internet company in New York City. Before that, she had broad responsibilities for direct marketing at three corporate giants– IBM, Ziff-Davis and Time Warner.

At IBM, she served as director of direct marketing, North America, for the IBM hardware, software and services brands, leading a team of 140 direct marketing professionals. She then moved to the IBM Software Group, where she directed global direct marketing.

At Ziff-Davis, she served as vice president of marketing for the electronic publishing division, and later helped launch Ziff’s Consumer Media Group as its vice president of marketing. At Time Warner, she worked in marketing, new business development and general management for the Book-of-the-Month Club and Time-Life Books.

Ruth has been a regular columnist for DMNews and is a frequent contributor to a variety of marketing publications. She teaches marketing to graduate students at Columbia Business School and NYU’s Stern School of Business. Ruth serves on the boards of the Direct Marketing Idea Exchange in New York City and the Direct Marketing Club of New York.

She is past chair of the Business-to-Business Council of the Direct Marketing Association and holds a BA from Hamilton College and an MBA from Columbia University.

Debaters: Alan Kaufman, Ed Martino, Larry Cohen, and David Teten

Team Old School: Alan Kaufman and Ed Martino

Alan Kaufman
Alan Kaufman is a 38 year veteran of the Computer/Software/IT Industry. He was a founding member of the management team of Cheyenne Software, Inc., where as executive vice president of sales, he grew the business from $1 million in fiscal 1990 to over $200 million in 1997 to propel Cheyenne into the 13th largest software company in the industry. He has served as an officer in the Navy and holds a BS in Electrical Engineering from Tufts University. He serves on the Board of Directors of NetIQ, a leader in server and security management, and is a Trustee of Outward Bound USA. Alan also serves on the Board of Directors of NYSIA and is its founding president.

Ed Martino, Director of Industry Business Solutions, Sprint Nextel
Ed Martino is currently the Director of Industry Business Solutions for the new Sprint Nextel Company. He has worldwide responsibility for the market penetration, solution development and overall growth in industry sectors for Financial, Insurance, Media and Professional Services, a $2b business area. Prior to this role, Ed was the Director, Northeast Corporate Sales for Nextel Communications. Other roles have included the Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales reporting to the President for two companies both in the global systems integration business. Ed also served in various global management positions for the IBM Company for eighteen years.

Ed is a member of several boards including the NY Software Industry Association where he is the Vice Chairman.

Team New School: Larry Cohen and David Teten

Larry Cohen, EVP, Heartbeat Software
Larry Cohen is one of the most creative and inventive minds in the software business. He has that rare ability to listen to a business problem, quickly isolate the key issue, and translate that insight into a practical software solution.

From his early days in the industry, Mr. Cohen has demonstrated a remarkable instinct for identifying a new technology solution and putting it to work quickly. Shortly after graduating from UC Berkeley, he pioneered the use of Webcasting in the healthcare industry. Soon after, he received an NIH grant to conceive the first online adherence programs ever developed.

Larry was a driving force behind the first enterprise-class, web-based software products for Marketing Content Management (MCM) in the financial services industry. He devised a highly innovative technology and methodology for performing online competitive intelligence. And lately, he’s been fashioning a new form of CRM that integrates data-mining and web services.

Throughout his career, Larry has closely advised some of the world’s most prestigious organizations, including Amgen, Novartis, GSK, Goldman Sachs, UBS, and Intel.

David Teten, CEO, Nitron Advisors
David Teten is a serial entrepreneur and CEO of Nitron Advisors, an independent research firm which provides hedge funds, venture capitalists, and other institutional investors with access to a network of frontline industry experts. He is also coauthor of The Virtual Handshake: Opening Doors and Closing Deals Online, the first business guide to how to use blogs, social network sites, and other online networks to accelerate your sales. He blogs on the Circle of Experts Brain Food Blog and at TheVirtualHandshake blog. David formerly worked with Bear Stearns’ Investment Banking division as a member of their technology/defense mergers and acquisitions team, and was a strategy consultant with Mars & Co. He holds a Harvard MBA and a Yale BA.

NOTES ON THE EVENT:

Larry Cohen, EVP, Heartbeat Software

David and I see 5 main differences between the ‘old school’ and the ‘new school’ of sales and marketing:

1. The new school sells highly focused products. The new school goes after underserved, highly niche markets (and submarkets) that do not have much competition or many me-too products. For example, Heartbeat Software does not sell CRM to pharmaceutical sales organizations. We sell a highly specialized CRM product to Medical Affairs Departments and their Medical Science Liaisons. Due to our specificity, we are able to work with the majority of pharmaceutical companies and offer them incredibly specific learning from their competitors. We aim to penetrate the majority of these markets (and have done so in pharmaceuticals). Similarly, Nitron Advisors focuses specifically on introducing their clients, hedge funds, VC funds, and law firms, to industry experts—and more specifically experts in transition.

The new school understands that we need to do a few things very well and that companies buy software because their competitors have bought software - period. One client told me that if no one has bought the software they would never buy it. If everyone has it — what’s the point? But if a few key competitors have purchased, they will quickly jump on board. Non-vertical specific back-up software, data storage, or cell phones are not specific enough to attract the new school.

2. The new school does not waste valuable marketing dollars on soft, non-focused, and unproven channels. The new school uses on-line and off-line tools that have a proven, measurable ROI by creating a direct, track able, one-to-one relationship with our customers. Among the major mechanisms for this:

+ highly targeted old school cold calling with a new school spin; selling a proven piece of software to a sub-market that is not being called on;

+ e-mail marketing to very specific titles and organizations where we have market share, with tracking provided by software provider;

+ Pay per Click search engine advertising (Google, etc.)

+ Pay per Call search engine advertising (Ingenio, etc.)

(Teten’s editorial note: Eloqua offers some useful marketing ROI tools.)

3. The new school focuses on smarts & network, not necessarily experience. Sales methodologies are interesting. They are also boring and notoriously difficult to get to stick or to actually change behavior. The new school understands that growing a stellar sales team is about hiring smart, energetic people who are great at sales. What makes a good salesperson? The new school knows that it is one thing: A person that keenly understands the part of themselves that other people relate to and who can leverage that part to get people to buy. We hire those people. No matter what experience, sales training, or existing client relationships they have. Google famously put a billboard up on the road from San Francisco to San Jose that had a complex mathematical problem on it. If you solved it, you gained access to a recruiting website. The new school knows that smarts goes a tremendously long way.

4. The new schools taps online networks, not only face-to-face networks. Consider that 84% of U.S. Internet users have used the Internet to contact or get information from an online group—more than have used the Internet to read news, search for health information, or even to buy something. More and more of us are using online networks, such as blogs, social network sites, virtual communities, and other “social software” as a daily part of our business life. All the major Internet players, including Yahoo!, Microsoft, AOL Time Warner, eBay, and Google, are already offering social software tools and planning more in the near future. Bill Gates, John Kerry, and other celebrities are among the over 2 million people currently registered on LinkedIn, a popular business networking site. Nitron Advisors uses these technologies both to target customers and to recruit new industry experts on our clients’ behalf.

5. The new school sells based on product quality, not just on who plays better golf. Many salespeople spend a tremendous amount of time and energy playing golf and drinking beers with customers. They believe that a personal “I like him” relationship is key to closing the sale. In the new world, that relationship is helpful, maybe even a prerequisite, but it doesn’t close the sale.

Neil Rackham, founder of sales consultancy Huthwaite, conducted a study of whether salespeople who built good relationships would really make more sales:

“We found that sellers who dealt successfully with small retail outlets in rural areas seemed to rely heavily on personal factors in their selling. . . . For example, the seller might ask, “How’s Ann enjoying her riding lessons?” . . . In rural areas, where the size of the sale was small, successful sellers used more of these personal references than did sellers who were less successful.”

“But it was a different story in the large urban stores, where the average sale was more than 5 times the size. We found no relationship between success and reference to personal issues[emphasis added].”

… “I’ve heard many other professional buyers complain about salespeople who try to open calls by cultivating areas of personal interest. The last thing a busy buyer wants is to tell the tenth seller of the day all about his last game of golf. . . . Many buyers become suspicious of people who begin by raising areas of personal interest.”

Source: Neil Rackham, Spin Selling (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1988), 140.)

Alan Kaufman

After Cheyenne sold, I retired. Soon after, I was approached by the VP of sales for NetIQ Corporation and asked where I found my stellar employees. The answer was that I trained them. Training is incredibly important. Every new situation I went into was different. I never took a cookie cutter approach to anything. A good sales/marketer carries a quiver full of arrows and can use each one for any new situation that arises.

Sherri Sklar, President, Sherri Sklar Strategies, LLC

As my first question, can you sell a complex software solution without meeting the client face to face?

Ed Martino, Director of Industry Business Solutions, Sprint Nextel

Yes, you can, but I wouldn’t advise it. If it’s complex, it needs lots of service. The biggest cost is in the service side and your goal is to build a bridge to the customer and use them as a referral to build business.

David Teten

Yes you can. Salesforce.com does it all the time. That said, the more complex the product and particularly the after-sales support, the more helpful meeting in person can be.

To sell virtually, you first need credibility (your potential clients and competitors look you up online and evaluate the validity of your service) and second, effective relationship management.

Ed Martino

I disagree with David. Most of Salesforce’s sales are to corporate customers and their success depends on the time that they spend with their customers.

David Teten

But it is impossible for a company to meet with all their smaller customers.

Alan Kaufman

You must identify how complex a sale is and whether you need to go out there to meet face to face.

Ruth P. Stevens

To be competitive in getting the product to market, how should the marketing be structured? What is the best marketing approach?

Larry Cohen

At Heartbeat, customers pay for product development. Marketing should focus on specific departments in like companies. When we call someone who works in hedge fund marketing, and say we have a product designed just for him, we get a good response rate. It’s not spam if the person is interested in buying what you sell.

Alan Kaufman

Good marketing programs include people who are interested in talking to analysts to see how the customers are buying. I don’t believe in print advertising, especially if you are working with a small budget.

Bruce Bernstein

How should you go after your target market? How do you enable the sales to happen? How do you structure the sales team?

Ed Martino

It all depends on the size of companies. It always takes lots of research and phone calls, and knowledge of the competition. Draw 3 circles:

1. What business am I in?

2. What are the customers’ needs?

3. What does the company have to offer?

The little space where the circles overlap is what you develop and present to the CIO.

Larry Cohen

Small software companies are unable to pay to talk to analysts, so they must talk to businesses in the area for the problem they are going to solve. Refer to previous success that you’ve had at one or two other companies.

Ed Martino

I agree that if you don’t have a large enough budget, don’t talk to analysts. Talk to smaller CIOs from a niche group and then work your way up to the top.

Larry Cohen

I agree with Ed. We use that business model at Heartbeat Software.

Ruth P. Stevens

The marketing department must provide good leads for sales force. How would you suggest that you develop these leads?

Alan Kaufman

Having an inside telesales group that goes through incoming leads and cold calling is good. You also need to develop a good computerized process that is repeatable. Leads from the Internet need to be shown to the inside sales group as well.

David Teten

We get to the big dogs through networks. Each member of our sales team (and of our whole company) has a personal network that we can tap.

In addition, no surprise, we use online networks. We post intelligent comments on someone’s blog to make an entrée, and get into a target’s network in that manner.

Microsoft has approximately 1,200 bloggers out of 55,000 employees. There is no excuse to cold call Microsoft; just contact a blogger in your target area, and use their blog as a conversation starter.

Ruth P. Stevens

What incentives do you use for the sales team to follow up?

David Teten

Pay people a good commission. Develop a sense of ownership. Give options.

Larry Cohen

We have company wide minimums. If it’s a top 25 pharmaceutical company we go in person and talk to them

David Teten

In order to get leads, people should be thinking about how to talk to their particular network. This method is much easier than getting leads from a database company.

Bruce Bernstein

The old school is emphasizing structure and the new school is going with leads. We hate the people who contact people for business by my boarding school alumni directory. What do you think about David’s method?

Ed Martino

If you have a niche, then you don’t need to worry about making the phone call. If you’ve got value and you’ve done the research, then the other person may actually appreciate the call.

Bruce Bernstein

It might also be a generational thing. The youngsters don’t mind getting the networking call.

David Teten

The issue is how to get the most targeted individual. Email used to be an effective means, but today, email is broken. You can’t reach people easily via email due to spam filters and overuse of the email medium. If you can find the name of person in your sweet spot, call them. Even the shallowest referral is better than an cold call.

Sherri Sklar

What are the most important things that someone in marketing can do to create a buzz for their firm and their product?

David Teten

Get to opinion leaders. Get to bloggers. They are very powerful way to spread word of mouth. That’s a large reason why companies like Foldera have attracted over 1 million downloads—great coverage in influencer blogs like Techcrunch and Om Malik.

Lead events. Be a speaker and put yourself in a leadership position. You will reach far more people speaking at a conference, than you will handing out business cards before one. Reach 100 people, not 5.

Ed Martino

Blogs sound good. We want to look into them. Press releases are also good. Sometimes a trade show is a good idea, if you can find ways to bring customers too it. You will create a buzz just from saying that you are going to be at the show. Target is the key word. Marketing to promote your product in a targeted way is very important.

Larry Cohen

For selling to institutional investors, I lean more toward conferences on asset management trends, rather than trade shows, since marketing and business people will be speaking at them. Pay for your sales people to attend, and shake hands and create relationships. It’s cheaper to send 5 salespeople than to get one corporate sponsorship.

Alan Kaufman

The trade shows that you choose to attend must have your customers there. I like to allow our customer a chance to demo our products. If possible, get a small booth so people can at least see your company logo.

Ed Martino

It’s all about ROI. It can make the difference between a million in sales and 60-70 billion in sales. ROI is key. You must be selective and you must leverage the money that you put out to get a return.

Sherri Sklar

How do you grow a stellar sales team? Do you simple hire energetic, smart people, or is there much more?

Ed Martino

I am big on balance. People with fire in the belly are important, but what you really need is diversity because it enables different groups and people to bring in their abilities to the sales force. You want young people who are energetic and idealistic to bring in pep, and older people who can bring in learned skills to pass on. You also need people from the industry for which you are selling. The younger people will give you a lot of overtime. Motivation, however, is key. People need to feel empowerment and ownership.

Larry Cohen

We are a $10m company. Each person needs to meet their quota. We do, however, go after a wide range of people. The key is to find people who know what about themselves makes them successful. We interview a ton of people, but after they are hired, 99 percent of them stay.

Ruth P. Stevens

As sales managers, how do you optimize profits to your firm when the sales team is always trying to give away a deal?

Alan Kaufman

I think it is sloppy to sell on price. You can always cut a deal if you have to. If they cut a deal too much, the loss should come out of the salespersons percentage.

Larry Cohen

We need to train people to stay by their product.

David Teten

Another idea is to pay your sales team a commission on margin instead of based on revenue. This margin info should be shared with your team, but it often isn’t. We show all our new employees our full business plan on their first day of work, because we want them to understand the big picture.

Ed Martino

In smaller companies, I would drop price to get marketing traction. If the customer will eventually become a testimonial, then it’s good. You need to take risk. Larger businesses need to have focus. They need to pick customers. At the end of the day, you want sustainability. In smaller companies, salespeople don’t see the sales price, and that’s why they try to give it away for lower.

Sherri Sklar

If someone says that he is interested in your software if you can prove to them that it is buy worthy, do you fly someone out? How do you approach the relationship?

Larry Cohen

Because products are focused, we phone and then fly to meet with them. I’ve learned that we are more likely to make the sale if we stick to the price, because if we slide, then they may question the value of the product more and more.

Alan Kaufman

In today’s world, regions are a lot larger so you have to be careful about support. How would you support your product in South Africa? This scenario requires discipline in the sales force. They should know not to go after crazy leads. If it’s a one-time, you might want to walk away, but if it’s American Airlines in Texas, you have a lot of chances to make other sales.

Sherri Sklar

What technologies can you use if you don’t know what the return will be, you don’t want to lose it the sale, but you also don’t want to send expensive resources out?

David Teten

Use all the media: IM, email, webconferencing, phone, in-person meetings. This allows for a steady progression of relationship closeness. Professor Caroline Haythornthwaite has done some very interesting research in this area showing that the more media channels you use, the higher the trust levels that develop between two parties.

QUESTIONS FROM AUDIENCE:

Scott Lichtman

How do you feel about PowerPoint and its role in sales pitches?

David Teten

People buy from people, not from paper. The more talking I do, the less selling I do. Communicate value and use a slide show for support. You want the attention focused on the company and the project, not the PC.

Ed Martino

I am seeing that the PowerPoint is here to stay. Today, it is more animated and you are trying to stay way from stale slides. There is more animation and stuff over the net. Webinars etc. are a great way to get your story in front of a lot of people.

David Teten

Humans are wired to be interactive. PowerPoints are passive, and your potential customers will learn less and buy less when they are passive. You need to keep them active if you want to keep them interested.

Bruce Bernstein

What method was used before PowerPoint?

Alan Kaufman

We used flip charts and then foils. I love listening to good speakers. A major problem today is that people don’t speak to the audience. Also, never read from your charts. If you read to your audience, you will lose them. Using a wipe-board works for developing an idea in front of a crowd. Using a PowerPoint can be a disservice.

Audience Member

In your experience, what best motivates a sales force?

Ed Martino

Incentives work if they are fun. Recognition of achievement is also important. Build a plan at the beginning of each year. Each person should know what the accelerator and multiplier is. If they blow the doors off, they will know what the cap is.

Alan Kaufman

Salesmen have fragile egos, and when they are in a losing streak, it gets to them. Give recognition to the people who perform the best. This has the incredible effect of reinforcing their positive performance.

Audience member

The three most important things for generating leads are current clients, (stealing from) competition, and referrals.

Larry Cohen

I find that if they have a rolodex, it may be all that they have to offer. That’s why we don’t go with them. At some point the rolodex runs out.

Alan Kaufman

There is nothing wrong with a portfolio, especially when you are trying to capture a vertical.

Larry Cohen

We put out our own PR, and when we come out with a new product, we send out targeted emails.

Bruce Bernstein

Earlier in evening, David Teten mentioned that email was broken. Ed Martino said that there is no place for instant messaging in corporate America. Please expand.

Ed Martino

Instant messaging is internal. Email should only be used because everything needs to be logged. Instant messaging isn’t on the radar screen, and it can’t be logged or archived.

David Teten

As the young grow up, instant messaging will become an increasingly important medium. There are plenty of companies which sell archiveable IM and email solutions. IM is being used regularly across corporate boundaries—we use it with our clients.

Bruce Bernstein

Are there fundamental differences in advertising that that came out during this discussion?

David Teten

1) There is a movement in spending from advertising in mass media to PR. We are so deluged with advertising that it has lost efficacy. However, people do read the actual content in the magazine around which the advertising is wrapped. A good PR firm can get you in there as content. We get sales leads every few weeks from a Businessweek article about us from last year.

2) Secondarily, there also exists a movement to advertising where you can calculate an ROI. We’re moving from pay per click, to pay per action or pay per call. Compare that with throwing a million dollars at the Superbowl and seeing what happens.

Ed Martino

I have to disagree because my company (Sprint) sponsored the Superbowl! It depends on the industry. If you are in a big industry you have to make a statement, so you have to go with pro golf, the Super bowl etc. If you do not advertise with it, people ask why you aren’t in it. Such mass advertising is important.

Alan Kaufman

No one can afford TV. PR means hiring an agency. It’s best if you can get someone to develop relationships with the editors of blogs. You have to stay on top of people who can influence the influencers

CLOSING STATEMENTS:

Ed Martino

There is more in common between the old school and the new school, because it is an evolution from one to the other. Sales and marketing is fun and the interrelationship and interdependence between that and finance is important. Ethics is also very important. Ethics is everything. You need to have respect for your customers and your competition. We need to be ethical about how we do our business.

David Teten

We’re in the advice/education business. Ironically, there is a lot of advice out there in the world, but most people don’t absorb it and don’t follow it. They listen but don’t learn.

I encourage people to internalize the ideas that we’ve discussed here. I hope that people learned something that they can take home and incorporate into their sales and marketing strategies.

And as last words: A.B.C.—Always Be Closing.

This post was written by David Teten, source: The Great Sales and Marketing Debate: The Cagey Sales Veterans Debate the Young Up-and-Comers

Planet Antispam update

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006

Quick update — I’ve added Ed Falk’s “Spam Diaries” to http://planet.spam.abuse.net/ .

This post was written by Justin, source: Planet Antispam update

DSL=GOT

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006

finally!

This post was written by Justin, source: DSL=GOT

Interim results from Johns Hopkins repository software study

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006

ProjectRepository from Johns Hopkins University has released some interim or preliminary findings. Excerpt:

With funding from the Mellon Foundation, the Sheridan Libraries at Johns Hopkins University has conducted an analysis of repositories and services based on a methodology for connecting user requirements with repository programmatic features. The Sheridan Libraries considered a diverse range of content types and end user services by developing and gathering numerous scenarios from multiple institutions, and collaborating particularly with MIT, UVA, and ProQuest to evaluate DSpace 1.3.2, Fedora 2.0, and Digital Commons. In all cases, we worked with the “out of the box” system and documented APIs.

During the Mellon Foundation’s Research and Instructional Technology (RIT) Retreat in 2006, MacKenzie Smith described three aspects of interoperability: semantic, protocol and functional. This analysis examined the protocol aspects by assessing the existing protocols of JSR-170, DR OSID, and ECL, and the functional aspects by testing the documented APIs from the aforementioned systems that can interface readily with applications. While the specific results from this analysis are noteworthy, it is worthwhile to affirm the importance of the methodology and the recommendations for next steps….From these [user] scenarios, we attempted to draw an explicit connection between elements defined in the scenario and specific repository features, which would be mapped to documented APIs. This connection would allow different individuals to understand repository needs in different contexts. For example, an end user might focus on scenarios to identify or articulate particular needs whereas a developer or programmer might focus on the repository features that relate to the scenarios. Initially, we felt that moving from scenarios to use cases to repository features would provide an explicit path for mapping between end user needs and technical specifications. However, our experience over the course of the project led us to alter this approach. We ultimately identified a set of repository features that encompasses a broad range of content types and service requirements, though the connection between the scenarios and repository features is implicit, reflecting the tacit knowledge of the project team gained through this analysis and previous repository-based projects such as the Archive Ingest Handling Test.

The set of repository features was used to conduct the analysis of DSpace, Fedora, and Digital Commons, and the repository API specifications JSR-170, DR OSID, and ECL. It is important to note that our analysis focused on the ability of each of these systems to support specific functionality through documented APIs. Future work should include additional analysis of other means for supporting functionality (e.g., user interface or application based import or access), and of additional systems (e.g., ePrints).

source: Interim results from Johns Hopkins repository software study

Search engine for OA chemistry lit now in a free toolbar

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006
ChemSpy is offering a free toolbar for the ChemRefer search engine, which specializes in the OA chemistry literature.

source: Search engine for OA chemistry lit now in a free toolbar

New OA journal on internet science

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006
The International Journal of Internet Science is a new peer-reviewed, open-access journal published by the Saarland University and State Library. (Thanks to Working Notes.) The inaugural issue is now online. From the site:
The International Journal of Internet Science is an interdisciplinary, peer reviewed journal for the publication of research articles about empirical findings, methodology, and theory in the field of Internet Science. It provides an outlet for articles on the Internet as a medium of research and its implications for individuals, social groups, organizations, and society….This journal combines Internet Science with Open Access. Conduct your research on the Internet, study the Internet, and make the papers with your results freely available on the Internet via this journal.

source: New OA journal on internet science

More on university support for OA journal fees

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006

The University of Chicago Library has a web-form suggestion box whose ideas appear on a public blog. (Good idea.) Here’s an unsigned suggestion from yesterday:

Some journals like Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) start to change their policy. They start to provide “Open Access,” but will charge the authors for publication fee. If the University have paid for annual membership, the publication fee will be much lower. For example, NAR charges $950 for authors from member inst., but $1900 for authors from non-member inst. Acutally, the University membership fee is only $2700 annually. Therefore, if the University did not pay the membership, the University community is very likely to pay much more for the publications than for the subscription. So, I propose the Library consider to pay for the membership. If needed, we can communicate with the University authority to find a optimal solution for the University as a whole.


(background: open access journals make their contents freely available online. Instead of charging subscription fees, most [PS: actually fewer than half] open access journals charge authors who submit manuscripts for publication. For more information, see the Open Access Overview.)


Currently, there is no official University policy regarding who pays the submission fees to a journal. Although the Library has purchased one open access “membership” (to BioMed Central), our position is that grant-funded research should have publishing costs written into the grant, or that University departments (possibly in conjunction with the Library) assume such costs as part of the “administrative overhead” of research.  The question of open access funding is still in very early stages, and we hope to continue discussing financial support for University authors with other areas of the University. In the meantime, I note that Nucleic Acids Resarch offers a partial or full waiver of charges for authors who can’t afford the submission charges.

source: More on university support for OA journal fees

Four great web sites, including OAN

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006

David Bollier, Four Great Websites on the Knowledge Commons, On the Commons, March 27, 2006. Excerpt:

In my constant effort to winnow timely and wise insight from the gushing cataract known as the Internet, I occasionally come across real gems. I thought it might be useful to showcase some of the commons-related sites that I have come to appreciate.

The Cooperation Commons is a fairly new website and blog, but it already has a wealth of great material and links of interest to commoners. The site, administered by Paul Hertzog and Mike Love, aims to “catalyze an interdisciplinary study of cooperation” to help solve social dilemmas. A “social dilemma,” as the site explains (paraphrasing UCLA sociologist Peter Kollock), “is a situation in which individual rationality leads to collective irrationality, or more simply put, what seems best for you isn’t best for the collective (including you).”…Another terrific site in the same general neighborhood is Michel Bauwens’ Foundation for P2P Alternatives. Since peer-to-peer networking is a key template for the emerging economy and social life, the material on the site, I believe, holds a lot of clues about the future shape of things. The site has expanded its contents recently, and now consists of a blog, wiki, newsletter on P2P developments and an overview of participatory media developments. A lot of material to pore through, but it’s all nourishing and well-organized.

Finally, two other sites that speak intelligently about the knowledge commons.  Aram Sinnreich and Marissa Gluck, have started the RadarWaves blog as part of their new Los Angeles-based Radar Research consulting firm. Aram and Marissa wrote an essay about the dynamics of creativity in the music and fashion industries for the Ready to Share fashion conference held last year at the Norman Lear Center. They’ve got some keen commentary on breaking developments in media, technology, culture and commerce.  Another stalwart blogger prowling the ramparts of the knowledge commons is Peter Suber, over at Open Access News. Peter’s website has the latest, most comprehensive news on matters affecting open access publishing. An invaluable resource for keeping track of this rapidly changing field.

(PS: Thanks, David!)

source: Four great web sites, including OAN

Microsoft warns on browser bugs

Tuesday, March 28th, 2006


The year: 2006


“To avoid falling victim, Microsoft urged users to avoid websites
they did not trust and to refrain from opening attachments on e-mail
messages from unknown senders.”


<bwahahahahahahaha> <giggle> <snurf>
<hahahaha> “in this day and age, what on earth are they
thinking? why do people put up with this sort of nonsense? when will
people work out that life doesn’t need to be like that?”

<snurf> <snurf> <thud>



Tags:

[Comment Link for RSS]

source: Microsoft warns on browser bugs

Getting the value that publishers provide and paying for it

Monday, March 27th, 2006

Jan Velterop, Of value and money, The Parachute, March 27, 2006. Excerpt:

In a recent missive to all ACS (American Chemical Society) members, the Society’s President, E. Ann Nalley, warned against the dangers of jeopardising the tremendously useful, yet complex, journals-based system of publishing scientific research. In an open letter on her blog, OA activist Heather Morrison reacted to this, extolling the virtues of barrier-free access to the scientific research literature.  One might be forgiven for getting the impression that the two are at odds with one another. They might even think so themselves. However, both are right, in their own ways….


If researchers want to communicate their research results, it is perfectly possible for them to make it all available to anyone in the world for free. All they have to do is post their material on a on a web site or to deposit it in an OA repository. Why don’t they just do that? Why bother a publisher? Or is the publisher perhaps providing them with something that makes their articles more valuable - to them and to science - than they would be if just published unofficially on the web?  That, of course, is the key….[Publishing] adds tremendous value. But it carries costs.

Nalley’s letter is prompted by the NIH policies and Congressional draft bills that move towards requiring open access for federally funded research. The anxiety of the ACS and other publishers is justified as long as the NIH and congressional bills do not address the issue of costs associated with the tremendously useful journals system. They should take a leaf out of the Wellcome Trust book, which does address the issue with exemplary clarity. On their web site one can read that “…the Wellcome Trust […] will provide grantholders with additional funding to cover the costs of page processing charges levied by publishers who support the open access model” (my emphasis). The ACS should ask for that kind of commitment and clarity from the NIH, from other federal funding bodies, and from Congress. When open access is economically supported, Nalley and Morrison may find themselves on common ground after all.

Comment. The NIH does allow grantees to use grant funds to pay processing fees at OA journals that charge fees. It did so before it adopted its public access policy, which is why it isn’t mentioned in the public-access policy.

source: Getting the value that publishers provide and paying for it

Lost in regulation

Monday, March 27th, 2006

I’m just leaving Japan after a day long conference sponsored in part by the Japanese National Institute of Informatics. The morning session was sponsored by Creative Commons Japan and consisted of six presentations by people using Creative Commons licenses, or in a couple cases, doing things that depend upon CC-like freedom.

Japan is one of my favorite places in the world, and I love any excuse to be here. But I had a strange deja vu as I listened to the stories of what people are doing here.

In the late 1990s, I travelled a bunch to South America to talk about cyberspace. In conference after conference, I listened to South Americans describe how they were waiting for the government to enact rules so they could begin to develop business in cyberspace. That reaction puzzled me, an American. As I explained to those who would listen, in America, business wasn’t waiting for the government to “clarify” rules. It was simply building business in cyberspace without any support from government.

Yet as I listened to the Japanese describe the stuff they were doing with content in cyberspace, I realized we (America) had become South America. One presentation in particular described an extraordinary database the NII had constructed to discover relevance in linked databases, and drive traffic across a database of texts. I was astonished by the demonstration, and thought to myself that we could never build something like this in the U.S., at least until cases like the Google Book Search case was resolved.

And bingo — the moment of recognition. We are now, as the South Americans in the 1990s, waiting for the government to clarify the rules. Investment is too uncertain; the liability too unclear. We thus wait, and fall further behind nations such as Japan, where the IP (as in copyright) bar is not so keen to stifle IP (as in the goose that …).

(Oh, and re broadband: NTT is now well on its way to rolling fiber to the home. Cost per home — between $30-50/m, for 100 megabits/s).

source: Lost in regulation

More on Electra Press

Monday, March 27th, 2006

John Holbo, Electra Press - Will Work For Whuffie, part II, The Valve, March 26, 2006. Thoughts on Electra Press, an emerging OA press for the humanities. Excerpt:

Let’s start by asking the most basic question. Why is an electronic press an appropriate response to academic publishing in disarray?  Well, because the academic reputation economy lags behind the technology curve. In some screwy inversion of the history of money, it’s hard to get people to believe in something not backed by solid paper. But what exactly is the form of the shift we are working for? Just: get over the paper fetish? Not that I wouldn’t be pleased enough with just that. But really it seems to me that the main point should be: get over the paper fetish in the right way. And the right way is: by embracing the potential of academic publishing to be a ‘gift culture’….[I]t is important to be clear about how much the logic of academia already fits this model: namely, academics already produce to boost their reputations rather than to get paid….We live in a world of Amazon ‘search inside’, but also of copyright extension and, in general, excessive I.P. enclosures. The groves of academe are well suited to be exemplary Creative Commons. But there is no guarantee they will be. So we should work for that….To repeat: the goal should not be electronic publishing, per se, but embodiment of what academic publishing culture should be like, given the potential of electronic publishing. The answer: a generous gift culture.  We need an electronic press that embodies that. This might seem slighting of the sheer advantages of technology itself. But I think that’s coming, one way or the other.  What isn’t a foregone conclusion is the advent of a culture able to make the most of that technology….My first ‘Will Work For Whuffie’ post is here, in case you missed it way back in November.

source: More on Electra Press

Economics of open content

Monday, March 27th, 2006
Audio and video files of the presentations at the MIT symposium on the Economics of Open Content (Cambridge, January 23-24, 2006) are now online. (Thanks to the Digital Rights Network.)

source: Economics of open content

Ray English on OA and the serials crisis

Monday, March 27th, 2006

Steven Bell has blogged some notes about Ray English’s Friday presentation on the crisis in scholarly publishing. (Bell doesn’t say where the presentation was given.) Excerpt:

You must know Ray – he’s the latest winner of the ACRL Academic/Research Librarian of the Year award. But he’s also well known for his advocacy work in the area of the scholarly publishing crisis. As a small university library director I think less about the scholarly publishing crisis and the open access alternatives than I should. English’s presentation was the excellent overview of the issues that I needed. He covered the latest developments, the changes needed, the positive trends, and most of all, what librarians can do to create change. Here are some of the highlights:

* “It’s about access, stupid” - All the scholarly publishing crisis issues are related to access – loss of it , barriers to it, access to scholarship by users, access to publishing monographics; the failures to provide access are systemic and interrelated.

* Consolidation in the journal publishing industry produces price increases. When Elsevier acquired Pergemon, the Pergamon titles increased by 27%. When Kluwer acquired Lippincott the titles increased by 30%. See www.informationaccess.org for more info on industry consolidation.

* What if you owned this business? Someone else produces your product for you at no cost – they polish it up for you at your request - they even give you exclusive rights to it - then all you do is distribute it - and you get to sell it back to the people who produced your product at a good profit. Sounds like a pretty good business, right….

* There are signs of hope. We’re becoming more active – that’s good. This is becoming a national issue that governments are taking up. Faculty engagement in the issues is growing. There is cause for optimism – this may be resolved in our lifetimes.

That brief review doesn’t really do justice to the awareness English creates when he lectures about the scholarly publishing crisis and open access. For example, he also talked about disciplinary and institutional archives as possible alternatives for the distribution of scholarly research.

source: Ray English on OA and the serials crisis

Geek Dinner London, April 5

Sunday, March 26th, 2006

I hope that you’ll join me in London on April 5 for the next GeekDinner.

The venue is The Polar Bear which is just a stone throw away from Leicester Square

When: Wed April 5 2006
Where: The Polar Bear (in the lower level bar), 30 Lisle Street,
Westminster, London WC2H 7BA
Nearest Underground: Leicester Square
Time: 19:00 - 23:30
Cost: £5 for buffet food [payable on the door]
RSVP: http://www.geekdinner.co.uk/archives/2006/03/23/david-teten-geek-dinner-5-april-2006/

This post was written by David Teten, source: Geek Dinner London, April 5